Share This Page

Playing games with pay to play

| Saturday, April 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
John Cole | The Scranton Times-Tribune

HARRISBURG

With little fanfare, the state House last week unanimously approved a bill that attempts to end the “revolving door” in state contracting. And thanks to an amendment, it prohibits the state from entering into large-scale contracts with Iran.

Who could argue with that? The bill, sponsored by Rep. George Dunbar, R-Westmoreland, was aimed at curbing the practice in which top state officials move to industries they've been regulating and sometimes head back to state oversight agencies. Dunbar said it would stop the award of multimillion-dollar contracts based on “political favoritism.”

But what happened along the way was instructive on what's wrong with Harrisburg.

The Republican-controlled House defeated an amendment by Rep. Brandon Neuman, D-Washington County, aimed at stopping “pay to play,” whereby lucrative campaign contributions pave the way for state or local contracts. It's more than just theory. A grand jury report last month outlined a pay-to-play scheme at the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission in which contracts allegedly were rigged for those who donated to campaigns or provided gifts to agency officials.

It was defeated 107-91.

Neuman's bill would have put the onus on those bidding for state contracts. They'd be required to submit a disclosure statement with all contributions made in the previous two years. All disclosure statements would be reported on a state website. Contractors violating the provisions could be barred from seeking state contracts.

He had another proposal extending the time period for blocking contributions to four years.

Why would these measures be shelved?

“They (amendments) frankly were unenforceable and went too far,” said Stephen Miskin, a House GOP spokesman. He rejected any assertion it was rejected because Neuman is a Democrat.

Miskin contends it's part of a political strategy by House Democrats to force votes on issues like this that may sound good but are flawed. Sometimes, the Democrats' tactic is to “oppose everything to score political points.

“It doesn't mean we won't get to pay-to-play legislation in light of the turnpike,” Miskin said.

“We think they were good government amendments,” said House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont. Good government, after all, is good politics, he says.

Throughout Democrat Gov. Ed Rendell's tenure, House Republicans led the charge for contract reform, claiming abuse by agencies during the Rendell years. So why not now?

Despite the flap over the Neuman amendment, don't be surprised to see a comprehensive pay-to-play bill pushed by House Republicans and, perhaps, passed quickly.

This type of legislation likely never got off the ground before because anything that remotely threatened the Turnpike Commission's autonomy was squelched by senators who had some control over the agency.

Brad Bumsted is the state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media (717-787-1405 or bbumsted@tribweb.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.