TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Kane's dangerous precedent

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Saturday, July 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

HARRISBURG

In November 2014, Gov. Tom Corbett is defeated by Democrat Allyson Schwartz. In this hypothetical scenario, Schwartz then serves alongside fellow Democrat Kathleen Kane, the state attorney general.

A lawsuit is filed challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's “stand your ground” law, approved in 2011 by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Corbett, a Republican. It provides an expanded claim of self-defense for shooting an assailant outside the home — on the street, in a car, in the office.

Kane recently announced she won't defend the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's 1996 law banning gay marriage. She said she could not ethically do so because it is unconstitutional. Under the Commonwealth Attorney's Act, which established the Office of Attorney General, Kane said she is allowed to delegate defense of a lawsuit. It's sent to the General Counsel's Office, which is under the governor. Many matters routinely are deferred. But defending the constitutionality of a statute might be different, former attorneys general say.

The AG's office was established through a constitutional amendment approved by voters in 1978. The office was set up separately because Pennsylvanians, fed up with corruption under the Milton Shapp administration, wanted to see the attorney general operate independent of the governor.

So under the hypothetical scenario described above, Kane delegates the case to the general counsel under Schwartz (or any liberal Democrat). But since the general counsel works for the governor, the governor then tells the general counsel he or she is opposed to the stand your ground law and defers to the attorney general.

The net result: Neither the commonwealth's top lawyer, the attorney general, nor the governor's lawyer defend the law.

It is not far-fetched given the uproar over the George Zimmerman case and the killing of Trayvon Martin.

A Florida jury's acquittal of Zimmerman on murder and manslaughter charges prompted calls across the nation for repeal of stand your ground laws. More than 20 other states, including Pennsylvania, have laws similar to Florida's.

But if the commonwealth doesn't defend the law, the plaintiff would win by default. (Any third, private party that might step in to defend the law likely would be found to have no standing.)

The top state lawyer should defend a law approved by the General Assembly and signed by the governor. Lawyers regularly defend cases and defendants they find reprehensible. They are advocates. The attorney general is paid to defend state law.

Kane's move was bold. Pennsylvania polls show a shift toward acceptance of gay marriage. That, however, is not the point.

Brad Bumsted is the state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media (717-787-1405 or bbumsted@tribweb.com).

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Rangers clip Penguins, take 2-1 series lead
  2. Cubs’ rookie third baseman Bryant helps send Pirates to defeat
  3. Scoring struggles linger for Penguins 2nd line
  4. Burnett’s evolution from thrower to pitcher helps him stay on top of his game
  5. Alle-Kiski roundup: Fox Chapel baseball team wins 5th straight game
  6. Feud escalates between Westmoreland commissioner, controller
  7. St. Vincent unveils logo with an `edge’
  8. Rangers continue mastery on the road
  9. Security to tighten for airport workers
  10. New Ken raid nets 2 suspects, $4,000 in drugs
  11. The gathering storm: An IRS defeat