The curious case of Corbett's deleted emails
Whatever you wanted to believe was reflected in the set of facts surrounding the dramatic revision of the Pennsylvania attorney general's email retention policy from five years to six months in February 2011.
It depended on your point of view and your like or dislike of Tom Corbett. He's the Republican governor who, as former AG, put corrupt lawmakers behind bars and began the investigation that led to the conviction of serial child molester Jerry Sandusky nine months after he became governor.
If you support Corbett, you saw the development, perhaps, as another annoying stage in a political move by Democrat Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She's conducting an unprecedented investigation of a highly successful criminal probe that resulted in Sandusky's conviction on 45 of 48 charges of molesting boys.
If you're against Corbett, who is seeking re-election as governor, the deletion of up to 1 million emails by Corbett's longtime top assistant Bill Ryan, as acting attorney general, was proof that a guy who convicted public officials with emails that were, in many cases, five to seven years old, caught a break with the dumping of his own emails. You would feel Kane is warranted in looking into the almost three years it took to convict Sandusky. Many of those critics see the email policy change as a cover-up to protect Corbett and other old-hand prosecutors.
In the least, it is a head-scratching and surprising development in Kane's investigation to unravel the events surrounding the Sandusky case. About the only thing you can safely conclude is that it helps explain why her investigation — a campaign promise — has taken over a year. She is reconstructing up to 1 million emails — a figure believed to be extremely conservative.
The set of facts was bad for Ryan and Corbett, though their longtime Information Technology director James Ignalzo told the Trib it was a “cost” and “management issue,” not a cover-up. And there's no proof of any wrongdoing, misconduct or bad intent.
To some, suspicion arises from facts like Ryan being awarded a plum job by Corbett, a $150,000-per-year post as chairman of the Gaming Control Board in August 2011.
And the fact is that Ryan had no way of knowing in February 2011 that a Democrat would become attorney general or that Kane would come out of nowhere to become the state's first woman AG. When Ryan made the decision, the Sandusky case was a month away from going public.
If the email deletions were aimed at protecting anyone, the timeline suggests it had more to do with Corbett's public corruption cases pending at the time. But even that's a big if.
Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter (717-787-1405 or email@example.com).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pirates top Cardinals, 5-2, on Davis’ homer; Alvarez, McCutchen hurt
- Dem Wolf eyes shale’s ‘golden egg’ to boost school funding
- For Steelers outside linebacker Jones, size is not an obstacle
- Elizabeth officials combat juvenile problems
- Steelers notebook: Team cuts 15 players, including LB So’oto, RB Hall
- Indiana County township ‘afraid for the water’ fights waste well
- Latrobe law firm’s secretary pleads guilty to income tax evasion
- Steelers cornerbacks Allen, Gay, Taylor have something to prove
- Mentor role suits Penn State lineman Mangiro
- Medical pot advocates state their case at town hall meeting with Sen. Folmer in Export
- Pittsburgh paramedics treat 38 people at Stage AE concert