ShareThis Page

Is a natural gas severance tax ahead?

| Saturday, March 8, 2014, 9:00 p.m.


Since Democrat Gov. Ed Rendell's second term, Democrat legislators have been railing about the need for a severance tax on natural gas drilling. The revenue from that imagined tax has been spent hundreds of times over in debate — solving virtually every major problem facing the commonwealth.

Rendell called it a “wildly popular tax” and indeed polls have shown people don't mind nicking drillers who are making billions.

But in reality the tax proposal was going nowhere. A Republican-controlled Legislature — even when some GOP lawmakers agreed on a modest, reasonable tax — was not about to give Rendell more revenue to squander. At least that's the way they saw it.

When Republican Tom Corbett became governor in 2011, a severance tax was off limits. His position was that a severance tax would not help attract new drilling and jobs and would drive some companies out. Only when it became clear that even many Republicans thought a tax was necessary to at least cover costs of municipalities affected by drilling did Corbett seem receptive. A so-called “impact fee” emerged with most of the money covering drilling fallout and about $4 of every $10 raised paying for statewide environmental projects. It was called a fee rather than a tax in part because Corbett signed a no-tax pledge while running for governor.

The impact fee was part of Act 13, which also attempted to provide “uniformity” for Marcellus shale drillers by allowing state regulations to supersede local zoning ordinances. Those provisions were overturned by the state Supreme Court in December. Last month, the court refused arguments by the Corbett administration to reconsider. The high court directed Commonwealth Court to decide whether the impact fee can still be levied.

It's not clear what will ultimately happen to the fee/tax. It could be overturned.

Meanwhile, the seven Democrats running for governor support a higher severance tax. Frequent references are made to other drilling states with high taxes, like Texas (forgetting to mention Texas has no corporate net income tax; Pennsylvania's tax is one of the highest in the world). I've heard repeatedly, however, that drillers expect to be taxed and most would not oppose a reasonable tax.

If the fee is overturned, watch for a flurry of legislative activity to pass an extraction tax. GOP legislative leaders might not be able to hold back amendments to pass a tax with a capital “T.” That could place Corbett in the difficult position of vetoing such a tax in an election year as opponents talk about him passing up hundreds of millions more in revenue.

Another scenario, if polls are to be believed, is Corbett will not win re-election.

Even if the Legislature remains in Republican control, a new Democrat governor who campaigned on taxing drilling companies would not likely be turned down. The Democrat candidates have specified uses, such as education. Some say a portion of any tax should still cover local impact costs.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter (717-787-1405 and

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.