ShareThis Page

Sailing around the Horn of Crazy

| Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a “request for proposals,” better known in governmentspeak as RFPs, to create six drone test sites around the country. There's talk of a market-fueled multibillion-dollar civilian drone industry for a variety of applications. The FAA also has posted a draft plan designed to ensure the “privacy” of the civilian population. Right. You can bet that civilian population won't even bother with reviewing that plan. It's already calculating what kind of rifle, scope and ammunition it will need to ensure that privacy. ...

Ken James, the police chief of Emeryville, Calif., says it's a “myth” that a gun is a “defensive weapon.” Do you think that more than a few folks who have thwarted attacks by gun-wielding criminals might just disagree a teensy-weensy bit? ...

House Bill 545, just introduced in the Missouri General Assembly, not only would outlaw the sale of “assault weapons” — semiautomatic rifles and pistols that mimic the stylings of fully automatic military weapons and have magazine capacity of more than 10 rounds — but would compel current owners to, within 90 days, render them inoperable, surrender such weapons and magazines to the state for destruction or remove them from the state. Never mind that not only is the Missouri Constitution ( Article I, Section 23) crystal clear in the right of Show Me State residents to keep and bear arms, it forbids (as does the Pennsylvania Constitution) the state from even questioning that right. Anybody care to wager that law-abiding, Constitution-protected Missouri gun owners will show something in particular if the Missouri Gun Police ever start making their rounds? ...

All the evidence one needs to affirm that the Obama administration is filled with unleavened idiots (i.e., government human drones incapable of rising to the truth) can be found in its tragically ignorant economic proposals of last week. Topping the list is a diktat that the federal minimum wage should rise to $9 an hour. It will reduce entry-level employment opportunities for young workers by the tens of thousands and force many businesses that operate on the thinnest of margins — think restaurants — to lay off workers. The “proof” the White House cites to the contrary has been thoroughly discredited, repeatedly. Talk about sailing around the Horn of Crazy. ...

A close second on the Idiot List is President Obama's proposal for universal preschool for 4-year-olds. Pay no attention to the federal government's own conclusions about the utter failure of Head Start to provide any lasting cognitive benefits — a failure whose cost is measured in billions of wasted taxpayer dollars and counting. What the president actually is proposing is a massive expansion of what should be called the Federal Babysitting & Indoctrination Service. As per usual, don't expect the seeds of critical-thinking skills to be sown but do expect in 15 years or so another bumper harvest of a new entitlement generation. ...

Obamanomics has been such a “success story” — all together now: “AHEM!” — that the number of those living in the country on the food stamp rolls has risen from 31,939,110 when Barack Obama first took office in January 2009 to 46,815,916 as of November 2012, the most recent data available, reports That's an increase of nearly 15 million during the Obama “recovery,” or just under 47 percent. ...

A Montgomery County state senator gets it half right in his call to legalize the sale and use of marijuana. Democrat Daylin Leach says marijuana should be made available to adults at state liquor stores. And, of course, it would be taxed. Actually the better idea would be to let private enterprise prevail. There's no reason for marijuana not to be sold everywhere that wine, distilled spirits and beer are sold under Gov. Tom Corbett's liquor privatization plan — or your friendly neighborhood hookah shop, for that matter.

Colin McNickle is Trib Total Media's director of editorial pages (412-320-7836 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.