Share This Page

Tom Purcell: End single-sex public education

| Saturday, Aug. 25, 2012, 9:09 p.m.

The Daily Beast article brought back several painful memories.

According to the article, a public middle school in West Virginia is being sued by the American Civil Liberties Union for separating boys and girls into single-sex classrooms.

School directors, motivated by research that shows single-sex education can improve learning, have been experimenting with the concept.

The ACLU, though, says single-sex education reinforces gender stereotypes — that teaching kids differently on the basis of gender defies Title IX, a portion of the Education Amendments of 1972.

Title IX states: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance ...”

I'm going to have to side with the ACLU on this one.

You see, in the late 1970s, I became the first male student to attend an all-girls boarding school — an experience that haunts me still.

The school refused to admit me, so I filed suit. Since the school accepted public funds, the judge ruled that it had to let me in.

My female classmates harassed me from the beginning. They said I was a wimp. They printed up T-shirts: “152 debutantes and one dork!”

The school's administrators were out to get me, too. They forced me to follow school regulations to a T. Do you know how hard it is, while wearing a plaid dress, knee-high socks and Oxford shoes, to outrun neighborhood bullies?

To be honest, though, that dress, combined with a pair of boxers, gave me a freedom and comfort I haven't known since.

My teachers treated me harshly, too. I got an “F” in physical education. Sure, I was the strongest and fastest in my class, but my baton work was hideous and I never could do a split.

What's worse, school administrators denied me my constitutional rights by isolating me. I was forced to live in separate quarters on the other side of campus. Despite my frequent pleas, I wasn't permitted to sleep or shower with the others.

One night, while sobbing myself to sleep, the girls stormed my room and stole my athletic supporters. I still wake in cold sweats with memories of them running off with my most private possessions.

The stress finally caught up with me and I got into a fight.

One girl said I was a jerk. I told her she was immature. She told me to get a life. I told her she was a spoiled brat. Finally, one of the den mothers broke it up.

I know that boys and girls are different — that today's political correctness makes us pretend that there are no real differences between the sexes.

I know there are many studies that show that boys and girls can perform better in school when the other sex is not present — that different techniques can be used that can generate real results.

I know that one of the biggest issues in America is education and that schools should be free to experiment with a variety of techniques to find effective ways to teach children to “learn how to learn.”

But then again, there are other studies that say single-sex education is sexist and wrong-headed.

I think we ought to use the might of the courts and federal law to ban experimentation with single-sex schools, whether they turn out to work well or not.

That way, no kid will ever again suffer the humiliation I did as the first male to attend an all-girls school.

Tom Purcell, a freelance writer, lives in Library. Visit him on the web at TomPurcell.com. E-mail him at: Tom@TomPurcell.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.