Romney vs. Romano
By Joseph Sabino Mistick
Published: Saturday, Sept. 1, 2012, 8:58 p.m.
Mitt Romney is mighty lucky that his name is not Mitt Romano. Mitt Romney can have Swiss bank accounts and even sack away some cash in the Grand Caymans and Bermuda. Calling them tax shelters, he can explain that it is simply wise financial planning and declare that he has nothing to hide.
A guy named Mitt Romano could never get away with that. If Mitt Romano were running for president and it was discovered that he had shipped money overseas, he would face the same firestorm that engulfed Geraldine Ferraro and her husband John Zaccaro when she was running for vice president in 1984.
Zaccaro ran a real estate business and the couple filed separate tax returns. When demands were made that both release their returns, Ferraro announced that Zaccaro would not release his for fear of giving his business competitors an unfair advantage.
Then, Ferraro ran straight into an ethnic-stereotype buzz saw when she quipped, “You people who are married to Italian men, you know what it's like.”
After a week of media hounding akin to waterboarding, Zaccaro retreated and made his returns public. As it turned out, there was not much to hide, with a great deal of the couple's $4 million net worth tied up in real estate.
But the damage was done from the initial attempt at secret-keeping and the whole affair fueled those pesky intimations of Mafia connections that successful U.S. Italians have come to expect. Worse, any campaign momentum was lost forever.
Maybe Swiss bank accounts have taken a bad rap. But a quick Internet search provides a long list of dictators and swindlers who have used them, with nary an example of how they have been good for America. Generally, offshore investments take a hit in the popular media.
The public perception problem arises because smart investors and gangsters both use these accounts for the same purpose — to hide money and avoid taxes. But CEOs and investment bankers get a pass, invoking the mysterious labyrinth of high finance.
Mitt Romney might pull it off. He could stonewall on his tax returns and keep secret the balances in his secret bank accounts, wrapping himself in the legitimacy of big business. That is his right. But his taxes will remain the target of serious inquiry and popular ridicule unless he shares more.
In a close election, allowing suspicion to grow about tax returns and foreign banking is high-stakes gambling. Even the few votes you might lose can make the difference.
As Newt Gingrich said during the Republican primary, “I don't know of any American president who has had a Swiss bank account.”
That might not change.
Joseph Sabino Mistick, a lawyer, law professor and political analyst, lives in Squirrel Hill. Email him at: SabinoMistick@aol.com
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.