Share This Page

Naked truth

| Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, 9:17 p.m.

When England's William and Kate were surreptitiously photographed sunbathing in France, the nude pics of the princess were a tabloid sensation. But after millions of Internet hits, another au naturel celebrity hardly titillates in a world that has seen far more scandalous behavior.

More shocking for many were the naked opinions of Mitt Romney when he was secretly taped addressing a group of well-heeled supporters at a $50,000-a-plate fundraiser in tony Boca Raton, Fla. Long-touted by his detractors as an elitist, Romney confirmed his status in remarks that he thought were being heard only by folks just like him.

Before the dinner, Romney claimed that 47 percent of Americans pay no income taxes and that they “believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.” And he made it perfectly clear that his “job is not to worry about those people.”

So who are those people? One-half of Romney's non-taxpaying Americans simply do not earn enough to owe income taxes but they still pay payroll and state and local taxes. Of the other half, 44 percent are senior citizens and 30 percent are eligible for deductions for children and struggling families. This group includes wounded war veterans, those still in combat and students struggling to pay for an education.

The sheer nakedness of Romney's remarks jarred some conservatives. David Brooks of The New York Times called Romney's words “a country club fantasy.” Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard column was headlined “A Note on Romney's Arrogant and Stupid Remarks.” The Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan called for an intervention, saying of the campaign, “It's not big, it's not brave, it's not thoughtfully tackling great issues.”

Other conservatives doubled down on Romney's remarks and urged the candidate to do the same, following the advice of Redstate.com's Erick Erickson. Michael Walsh of National Review counseled tenacity, claiming, “Romney sounded remarkably like ... a real conservative.” Rush Limbaugh called the crisis a “golden opportunity” to talk about conservatism.

Either way, Romney has finally provided the specifics that so many have been demanding from him. There is now no doubt how he specifically feels about nearly one-half of Americans. And this knowledge is good for our democratic process, giving voters an informed choice between two very different candidates.

Who needs to know the specific tax loopholes and deductions he is going to close if elected? And who needs to see more than one or two years of his tax returns, even though his own father said that what “mattered in personal finance was how a man conducted himself over the long haul”?

Edward R. Murrow said, “Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them up, at least a little bit.” Not so with Romney, who immediately doubled down on his remarks, apparently comfortable now that his true values have been stripped bare.

Joseph Sabino Mistick, a lawyer, law professor and political analyst, lives in Squirrel Hill (SabinoMistick@aol.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.