Is one of the Mighty Casey's in jeopardy
By Brad Bumsted
Published: Saturday, Oct. 6, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
Will Pennsylvania's Mr. Smith go to Washington?
Tom Smith, that is. The former coal executive and farmer of Armstrong County was written off even by his own party when he decided to seek the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. And if he did somehow win, he'd be taking on the mighty Casey name in Bob Casey, son of the late Democrat Gov. Robert P. Casey.
Smith's party didn't support him.
The former Democrat switched parties to run for the Senate because he says he was outraged by the policies of President Obama and wanted to be in a position to do something about it.
Republican Gov. Tom Corbett twisted arms at the GOP State Committee meeting in January and convinced the party to endorse Steve Welch, whom no one had heard of then (or since).
But Smith had lots of money. He flooded the airwaves with TV ads telling his story of working his way up from a coal miner to a coal company owner and won the primary.
At a state committee gathering little more than a week ago, Smith received a standing ovation when he rose to speak. He received positive comments from Corbett and Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey via video saying Smith is a guy he'd like to have with him in Washington.
Tom Smith put his money where his mouth was.
All of a sudden the guy with the common name has name recognition. He also has a hard-hitting TV ad about Casey's record.
Last spring Casey led in polls by 18 to 20 percentage points. Last week, RealClearPolitics.com showed Casey with an average lead of 7 percentage points. A Tribune-Review poll showed Casey with a 5 percentage point advantage, almost within the margin of error.
Smith's rise is not only about gaining name recognition. It's about Casey not standing for much of anything, save being pro-life. But that's not an accomplishment, per se. It's a position.
Smith also says he's pro-life.
“Tea Party Tom” is how Casey characterizes him in ads. “Senator Zero” is how the Smith campaign refers to Casey because he's never had a bill passed.
Are Casey supporters worried? Some are. But it depends how much more money Smith's willing to spend.
Casey noted he's up against a “self-funded candidate” in citing reasons why he didn't speak at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte.
RealClearPolitics calls it a “Democratic leaning” race — and you'd have to say Casey has the edge.
But the potential is there for a huge upset.
Brad Bumsted is the state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media (717-787-1405 or firstname.lastname@example.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.