Ode to the middleman
By Donald J. Boudreaux
Published: Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2012,
You hear them daily: advertising pitchmen exclaiming on radio and TV that this jewelry store or that furniture retailer "saves you money by bypassing the middleman!"
Seems sensible, doesn't it• Wholesalers and other middlemen don't work for free; they must be paid. So if a retailer "bypasses" or "eliminates" the middleman, that retailer has "savings" that it can "pass on to you."
But if middlemen only raise retailers' costs, why does anyone ever use such parasites to begin with?
Simply to ask this question about middlemen is to cast doubt on the widespread myth that the dominant effect of middlemen is to raise the retail costs of goods.
It's true that middlemen must be paid for their services. These services are valuable, however, because they reduce the final prices that consumers pay at retail.
Middlemen who fail to reduce the final price go bankrupt; these middlemen are "bypassed." But middlemen in general reduce the costs that consumers pay at retail.
To see the value of middlemen, it's helpful to realize that retailers themselves are middlemen. The furniture store that brags of "eliminating the middleman" by "buying direct from the factory" doesn't itself manufacture sofas, beds and dining-room tables. That retailer specializes in acquiring inventories of furniture and assembling these inventories in locations that are convenient for you to visit (such as the strip mall down the street).
If it were generally true that middlemen raise consumers' costs, you'd be foolish ever to buy furniture from a retailer -- including the one who "eliminates the middleman." You would be better off going directly to the factory to shop for furniture.
But you almost never do so. You buy furniture from retailers. The reason you don't "eliminate the middleman" -- the retailer -- when you buy furniture is that the middleman saves you money.
To "eliminate the middleman" here would require you to rent a large truck and drive it (depending on where you live) hundreds of miles to the nearest furniture factory. The factory owner might be willing to sell to you a nightstand or chair for less money than you'd pay at retail. But this price discount likely isn't worthwhile. Not only do you spend time and money driving to and from the factory; once at the factory, you can't easily compare that factory's offerings with the offerings of competing furniture producers. To make such comparisons, you'd have to get back in your truck and drive to other furniture factories.
By the time you do all this driving around, the price reduction that you get by "eliminating the middleman" won't be worthwhile. You'll bankrupt yourself by trying to save money!
Wholesalers provide similar services for retailers. No supermarket grows its own lettuce or cans its own soups. It buys these items from wholesalers. And just as retailers lower your cost of buying goods for you and your family, wholesalers lower retailers' costs of acquiring inventories.
Wholesalers, for example, specialize in transporting goods from around the country, or even the world, and assembling these in accessible, central locations at which retailers' delivery trucks can be loaded. Wholesalers (like retailers) also generally vouch for the quality of the goods they supply.
None of this says that retailers can never innovate in ways that indeed allow them to save money by "eliminating" some middlemen. But it's useful to remember that middlemen's services -- such as supplying convenient access to large stocks of goods -- are valuable even though they involve no actual production.
Donald J. Boudreaux is a professor of economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. His column appears twice monthly.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins center Malkin won’t play tonight vs. Sharks
- Ravenstahl opposes Peduto’s early retirement plan
- Kovacevic: Got proof on Tomlin? Let’s hear it
- Ex-Penguins winger Kennedy ‘emotional’ about return
- Beaver County residents sue FirstEnergy Corp. over coal waste dump
- Schmotzer resigns high-paid administrative job with Baldwin-Whitehall
- Film about former Pirates pitcher Dock Ellis in prestigious festival
- Ex-Steeler WR Wallace: It was a ‘challenge’ for Haley to use me
- Businessman stole $3 million to keep his company going, lawyer says
- Dozens of workers strike outside Downtown fast-food locations
- No charges in Florida State QB sex assault case