ShareThis Page

Tuesday takes

| Monday, Oct. 31, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

What's that smell?: Parting is hardly sweet sorrow for the fired executive director of Pittsburgh's Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority. Henry Sciortino, 67, has been embroiled in allegations of fiscal mismanagement and is the target of an Allegheny County DA investigation. Yet he pocketed a sweet $48,000 “settlement” from the authority. This, without any explanation from officials, who scurry under the protective umbrella of a “personnel matter.” That won't contain the stench, which in this case is overpowering.

New hope for a closed prison: Although still conceptual, plans to transform the former state prison in Hempfield into a full-service veterans' transition campus are intriguing. Details about the proposed $150 million Veterans Sunrise Center at the 96-acre property are few. At the minimum, however, it's encouraging to see something happening at this site.

Booking a library's future: It's no secret that community libraries across the region are in a funding bind as revenue streams have been reduced and, in some cases, eliminated. So it is propitious that the board of the Greensburg Hempfield Area Library, along with community representatives, is looking ahead toward a new strategic plan. Although this work is in its initial stages, considerations include whether to seek a voter referendum for a dedicated tax to sustain the library. Better to address future funding than to await fiscal challenges that may consume future library services.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.