ShareThis Page

The ObamaCare scare: Avoiding doctors

| Sunday, Nov. 13, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

ObamaCare's expansion of health insurance to the previously uninsured — as trumpeted by apologists for government-managed care — is of little benefit to enrollees who skip doctor appointments to save money.

A study by the market research group GfK finds fully half of ObamaCare enrollees are ducking their doctors to sustain the well-being of their wallets. By the millions, ObamaCare patients previously were skipping doctor visits, according to the survey. Now, with mid-level exchange premiums scheduled to rise about 25 percent, “preventive care” will take on a new, albeit deleterious, meaning.

Even when it comes to surgery, 12 percent of the ObamaCare enrollees surveyed delayed procedures. Exactly what's the point of federally subsidized health care if those supposedly “served” by it avoid treatments?

“The law made insurance way too unattractive for relatively young and healthy people who are largely choosing to pay the individual mandate tax penalty instead of purchasing coverage,” says Brian Blase, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center.

And as the next open-enrollment period bows, the Affordable Care Act's online “marketplace” in Western Pennsylvania is now limited to UPMC and Highmark. Aetna and UnitedHealthcare have pulled out.

“Health care” becomes a non sequitur when rising costs dissuade patients — the sick and healthy alike — from seeing their doctors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.