ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Dec. 15, 2016, 3:36 p.m.

Laurel: For a generous donation. Volunteer firefighters provide a critical public service to their community — often on a shoestring budget. They depend on donations, such as the $42,000 that NRG Energy recently gave to the fire hall in Springdale. The fire company was able to replace a 1982 rescue truck it has had for about 10 years and purchase lifesaving hydraulic-cutting equipment that it couldn't afford. The Jaws of Life tool was an important acquisition for the department. Firefighters put it to use the same day to rescue someone from an overturned car.

We want to commend the company for being a good corporate citizen and for recognizing the financial challenges these volunteers often face. Maybe others will step up to make sure these public servants can afford the lifesaving equipment that is critical for their jobs and communities.

An observation: Opening a Pittsburgh police substation Downtown requested by residents, businesses and organizations in a minimal-cost storefront makes sense. So does including Port Authority and Point Park University police, and peak-activity staffing. But Downtown's residential boom and activity levels hardly are new. Might opening this substation sooner have helped avoid such regrettable incidents as August's near-riot in Market Square's vicinity and July 4's shooting near the Wood Street T station?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.