ShareThis Page

Tuesday takes

| Monday, March 20, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Bridge problem: A Kiski Township couple lost their home in a fire Saturday because firefighters couldn't get to the scene fast enough. The Bell Township fire engines were just a mile away on the other side of the Kiski River. But they couldn't use the Salina Bridge because of a 10-ton weight limit. They had to take a detour that was longer. Kiski fire Chief Rich Frain said the outcome would have been different if the engines from Bell weren't delayed by the bridge detour. The Kiski department is about 6 miles away, and getting there took twice as long. PennDOT is planning to upgrade or replace the bridge — but not before 2021. It should be done sooner to avoid another avoidable delay in getting to a fire. This is a matter of public safety.

Dangerous water: Colfax Upper Elementary School in Springdale is the latest school in the region to report lead in its water. The school district tested 12 fixtures and found unacceptable levels in water from a classroom sink. No details were provided on the levels detected. That's something that shouldn't be a secret. The district owes parents total transparency. But this story has somewhat of a silver lining. The district provides bottled water to students at the school anyway because the tap water is often brown. Lead, brown water? Both are a problem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.