ShareThis Page

Pa.'s M.I.A. budget: Any day now?

| Thursday, Aug. 17, 2017, 10:57 p.m.
The Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg. (Trib photo)
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
The Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg. (Trib photo)

On Wednesday, state Treasurer Joe Torsella announced a “troubling development”: release of a $750 million loan that the state must repay, with interest, within a week. He'd earlier said the money will “prop up the General Fund,” absent a revenue plan closing the $2.2 billion gap in the $32 billion budget. Since that budget's passage, Harrisburg's biggest story has been nothing — as in what Gov. Tom Wolf and lawmakers have done regarding budget-process completion.

As of Wednesday, online calendars showed the House last doing business July 22; the Senate, July 27. The governor's online schedule, tweets and news releases showed he'd done nothing explicitly related to budget completion this month, though the issue likely arose in a couple of interviews listed. And the newest story on PennLive's “Pennsylvania Budget” page was three weeks old.

Absent Harrisburg doing what it should, Mr. Torsella says, “the General Fund balance will again fall below zero by August 29th. Treasury continues to project a need for … borrowing of as much as $3 billion ... .” And he warned against assuming “that Treasury will continue to backstop the General Fund … .”

Harrisburg's dereliction of its budget-completion duty is obvious. At some point, Mr. Wolf and lawmakers will rush to just get something done. But they should have been working all along — in public, not behind closed doors — on this issue, not taking what looks to taxpayers, and to Wall Street credit-rating agencies, too much like a vacation from a fundamental responsibility.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.