ShareThis Page

Tuesday takes

| Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
State Rep. Marc Gergely
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Tribune-Review
State Rep. Marc Gergely

KOEA cares?: A collective sigh of relief accompanies news that the Keystone Oaks Education Association has reached a tentative agreement with the school district after threatening to strike on the first day of classes. Of course, it's no wonder local teacher unions often rely on this tactic when Pennsylvania leads the minority of states that still allow teacher strikes. More puzzling still is why the commonwealth hasn't joined the majority of states in outlawing teacher strikes.

Another one bites the dust: State Rep. Marc Gergely awaits sentencing after pleading guilty to two misdemeanor charges related to his role in an illegal gambling ring. The Democrat from eastern Allegheny County faced charges of accepting illegal campaign contributions. He's the latest inductee in Pennsylvania's Hall of Shame — former lawmakers and state officials who abused their public offices. All of them share an inexcusable contempt for the public. And that, sadly, reinforces Pennsylvania's reputation as the State of Corruption.

About time: The Woodland Hills School Board has closed “a difficult chapter” in accepting the resignation of Kevin Murray, its embattled high school principal and football coach. This, after the state Department of Education delayed renewing his administrator's certification amid controversies that emerged last fall, including an audio recording of Mr. Murray threatening a student. Such a disturbing narrative shouldn't have taken this long to conclude.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.