ShareThis Page

U.N. Watch: Sanctions 'no big deal'

| Sunday, Oct. 1, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
AFP | Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images
AFP | Getty Images

Another reported nuclear test by North Korea. And another round of United Nations Security Council sanctions, approved unanimously and touted by the State Department as “the strongest set of sanctions so far.”

Yet despite the latest U.N. crackdown, which prohibits importing all natural gas liquids and condensates and caps North Korea's crude oil imports, President Trump characterized the measures as “just another very small step, not a big deal.” And he's not alone.

Lawmakers, including Democrats, say the U.S. isn't doing enough to exert pressure on China — North Korea's steadfast ally and primary trading partner. According to Marshall Billingslea, an assistant secretary in the Treasury Department, China's leaders do nothing as the rogue nation uses its banks and front companies to conduct business.

And Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has suggested that there are more “tools” to put additional pressure on North Korea.

Meanwhile it's business as usual for North Korea's bank representatives in Russia, which flagrantly disregards “the very resolutions adopted by Russia at the U.N.,” Mr. Billingslea said.

For all its Security Council resolutions, the United Nations remains ineffective in curbing North Korea's nuclear ambitions. What's increasingly evident is that any solution to the North's nuclear brinkmanship will originate from outside the confines of Turtle Bay.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.