ShareThis Page

Score one for charter schools

| Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
In this Sept. 11, 2012, file photo, students walk in the hallways as they enter the lunch line of the cafeteria at Draper Middle School in Rotterdam, N.Y. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink, File)
In this Sept. 11, 2012, file photo, students walk in the hallways as they enter the lunch line of the cafeteria at Draper Middle School in Rotterdam, N.Y. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink, File)

A new study on teachers' attendance finds that almost 30 percent of public-school teachers are chronically absent, confirming earlier federal estimates. The study also shows that conventional public-school teachers are about three times more likely to be chronically absent than charter-school teachers.

Last fall, the U.S. Education Department estimated that 27 percent of teachers nationwide miss more than 10 regular class days annually, based on districts' self-reported 2014 data, the latest it had available. Now, a Thomas B. Fordham Institute analysis reinforces that figure, finding that more than 28 percent of public-school teachers miss at least 11 days annually, The Washington Free Beacon reports.

But only about 10 percent of charter-school teachers are chronically absent from their classrooms, according to the Fordham Institute. And charter schools' unionized teachers are twice as likely to be chronically absent as their nonunionized teachers.

Of course, some teachers' circumstances make prolonged absences unavoidable. But these instances surely account for only a small fraction of chronic absenteeism reflected in the federal estimates and Fordham analysis.

And with National Bureau of Economic Research findings linking chronic teacher absenteeism with decreased student outcomes, parents should be aware of such data in choosing their children's education — that is, those parents who have a viable choice.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.