ShareThis Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
A Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Fine Wine & Good Spirits store, photographed on Thursday, Sept. 29, 2016, in Youngwood.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
A Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Fine Wine & Good Spirits store, photographed on Thursday, Sept. 29, 2016, in Youngwood.

The 2018 GOP gubernatorial run that Sewickley's Laura Ellsworth, a Jones Day law-firm partner, has been mulling faces an obstacle of her own making. PoliticsPA reports that while she donated more than $30,700 to Republican candidates for federal offices since 2007 and more than $13,000 to GOP state candidates since 2013, she also gave Democrat candidates at least $11,500 since 2007. She likened her Dem donations to Donald Trump's as “part of doing business,” adding that Republicans “understand that business reality.” Whether they actually do is a question state GOP leaders and primary voters likely will be eager to answer if she does run. … New Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board regulations effective Oct. 1 require restaurateurs to pay upfront for 1,200 special-order-only items, instead of waiting to pay until pickup at a state store, and prohibit them from inspecting their orders at pickup. Also, any problems have to be taken up with vendors, not the PLCB. “This is what ‘liquor modernization' looks like,” the Commonwealth Foundation observes. Perhaps the PLCB is taking customer-service cues from Prohibition-era bootleggers. … PennLive noted a grim coincidence related to what's now America's biggest mass shooting ever: Monday's Las Vegas horror occurred on the 11th anniversary of the shooting of 10 girls at Lancaster County's West Nickel Mines Amish School, five fatally, by a gunman who killed himself. It's sobering to realize how the sheer number of such incidents dulls the memory of mass shootings that happened not all that long ago.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.