ShareThis Page

Bagged in Mt. Pleasant: This trick is no treat

| Monday, Oct. 9, 2017, 9:36 a.m.
Trib photo
Kristina Serafini | Tribune-Review
Trib photo

More than likely, Mt. Pleasant has opened up a bag of worms with its first-time official trick-or-treat bag policy for borough children. It's the proverbial government solution in search of a problem.

In response to the borough purportedly getting bombarded by “outsiders” during its scheduled trick-or-treat hours, Mt. Pleasant this year is providing its own Halloween bags; these can be picked up at the police department or fire station. But not to worry: Residents won't have to show their “papers” — proof of residency — to pick up bags for their children.

And local police won't be doing any random bag checks during trick-or-treat, scheduled from 2 to 4 p.m. Oct. 29. So ultimately, the question of whether to treat or not is left up to residents if munchkins show up on their doorsteps without the official borough bags.

Any conceivable gain from this bag policy is bound to be offset by negative PR. Are residents supposed to be so selective as to decide which kids deserve treats — and which kids don't — based on their trick-or-treat bags on an occasion that's intended for all children?

Residents, themselves, are fully capable of deciding whether to give out candy for trick-or-treaters and how much they'll provide. Ham-handedly specifying which kids are entitled to trick-or-treat in Mt. Pleasant inevitably is going to leave a sour taste in more than a few mouths.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.