ShareThis Page
Editorials

Trib editorial: The PLCB's 'eating place' crackdown

| Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
Rich Rosella of Allegheny Township, who runs the 6 Pack and Doghouse on Pittsburgh Street in Cheswick, re-stocks a bottle of beer at his store. 
Bill Shirley  |  For The Valley News Dispatch
Valley News Dispatch
Rich Rosella of Allegheny Township, who runs the 6 Pack and Doghouse on Pittsburgh Street in Cheswick, re-stocks a bottle of beer at his store. Bill Shirley | For The Valley News Dispatch

The state's recent “convenience” reforms have brought beer and wine sales to some grocery stores and gas stations, more beer-packaging options and a crazy quilt of rules and limitations for customers and retailers to navigate. Now, with its archaic wine-and-spirits monopoly remaining, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is cracking down on some licensees.

At issue are “eating place” license requirements for food, seating and place settings. Beginning in January, the PLCB — using authority granted by state Act 44 of 2017 to suspend such licenses immediately (when complaints lead to citations) — plans a crackdown on Philadelphia “Stop-n-Go” shops selling bottled beer under such licenses without meeting food or seating requirements.

Some Pittsburgh-area establishments are ensuring compliance by stocking canned soup, ramen noodles, or frozen hot dogs and buns, plus plastic utensils. That shows how farcical Pennsylvania's “convenience” push is for both customers and proprietors, and how this new PLCB enforcement authority is a step in the wrong direction.

True convenience would mean no nanny-state monopoly that's conflicted between enforcement and raising revenue, telling Pennsylvanians what alcoholic beverages they can and can't buy, and when, where and from whom they can do so. Lawmakers should be reducing the PLCB's influence and authority — not broadening both.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me