ShareThis Page
Editorials

Franklin Regional considers police

| Monday, June 11, 2018, 8:49 p.m.
The Franklin Regional School Board
File photo
The Franklin Regional School Board

The Franklin Regional School Board should not be discussing proposed security moves behind closed doors at this point in the discussion.

Former school director Dick Kearns was right to call out the school board at a recent meeting. The school board is going through the process to establish an in-house, three-member police force. At this point, the district is awaiting approval of a Westmoreland County judge.

It's a preliminary step. The district doesn't have a clear handle on what it could cost or a timeline for hiring someone, let alone interviewing candidates.

Yet the school board is holding its discussions in closed-door, executive sessions. The reason the board gave for one such private session was “security.”

“You've gotten no input from the public about this,” Kearns, a former board president, challenged the board. “You deliberated about it privately, you come out and announce that you're going to establish a police force, and we're going to have to pay for it.”

He noted that executive sessions are allowed for a handful of topics, and only when specifics are involved, according to the state Sunshine Act. Security isn't one of them, although there is a move afoot in the Legislature to change that.

School board member Gregg Neavin said the board has discussed various options with regard to its security plan. He did not elaborate.

“If you believe we have acted outside of the law, do what you feel is necessary,” school district Solicitor Gary Matta told Kearns. “But what I'm saying is that this board is acting for the safety of the children in this district.”

Nobody questions the board's ultimate goal. But that doesn't mean the board can do so in private.

Melissa Melewsky, a lawyer for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, said there's no “security” exemption in the state Sunshine Act.

“But even if there was … it should not apply to a discussion about whether to create a new staff security position within the school system,” Melewsky said. “School security officers operate in the open and are highly visible, with good reason.”

She said creating a new staff position “is one that must be addressed in public, with an opportunity for the public to weigh in before the decision is made.”

But, she added that if a county judge allows creation of Franklin Regional's police force, discussion about specific candidates for those positions could be held during an executive session.

Franklin Regional, which experienced a knife attack by a student that injured 21 people, is right to examine its security. Some will agree with the need for three in-school police officers. Some will not.

But the public has the right to weigh in. The ends don't justify the means.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me