Ho-hum political talk: Where's the substance?
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Oct. 12, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
It can't be missed: Politicians in TV ads proclaiming themselves job creators or would-be job creators.
In Armstrong County, we do a collective shrug and say, “ho-hum.”
Politicians don't create jobs; the best they can do is create the conditions for companies to establish in their districts while the economy dictates what actually happens.
Yet as news breaks periodically of economic development in other counties in the region, we do wonder why so little happens here. ACMH Hospital remains the largest employer.
There is something we can do that won't cost much money. We can demand that our political leaders promote this area in forums outside the county.
In the 1970s and '80s, the local political talk was of a county airport, completion of a four-lane Route 28 to Interstate 80 and of growing industrial parks. Yet the effort was internal. The airport and highway completion were not to be, and industrial park growth has haltingly advanced.
Candidates for state and federal office in this area need to promise that when they resume office or become new officeholders, they will make sure Armstrong County is on the map when the region is eyed by business leaders and entrepreneurs. Our fortunes are tied to regional growth.
Officeholders can't do it alone. They must enlist the best spokespeople in the public sector and in the business community to work with area congressional representatives, state leadership and regional officials to get the Armstrong story told.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- The case of Beaver County Sheriff George David: He should be jailed pending trial
- The Obama/Biden visit: Oh, the irony
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The Nevada standoff
- Voter fraud: Multiple-voting Melowese Richardson gets a federal pass
- The execrable VA: Something’s missing
- Paying the ObamaCare premium
- The problem with BNY Mellon: It wears blinders
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes