Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., is urging the post-election, lame-duck Congress to study the links between Hurricane Sandy and global warming. Some other member of Congress should urge a study of the link between America's poor esteem for Congress and proposals for nonsensical studies. ... Another week, another report of an electronic voting machine problem. The Marion Star in Ohio reports that an early voter selected Mitt Romney last Monday but on the touch screen Barack Obama's name came up three times. The same thing happened to a number of voters two weeks ago in Guilford County, N.C. Elections officials in both states say “recalibration” corrected the problem. It's all starting to sound pretty hinky to us. ... Vice President Joe Biden told a campaign rally last week that he was going to give the crowd “the whole load.” Finally, Mr. Biden tells the truth. ... Michael Moore and class="bold">MoveOn.org have teamed up to produce a profanity-laced ad “starring” residents of a personal care home, some of whom threaten violence on, if not the life of, Mitt Romney should he win the presidency by “stealing” the election. So, where's the Secret Service investigation? ... class="bold">Breitbart.com reports that Republicans have won every presidential election held on Nov. 6 since 1860. We like those odds.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- An independent Scotland? Think again
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Drilling laws: Your rights
- Ban felon-lobbyists? A better idea
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- U.N. Watch: The aid ingrates
- A misdialed number suggests a criminal conspiracy in the IRS scandal
- Saturday essay: Saving Catalpa