| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

'Election assistance'? Don't look here

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, 8:52 p.m.

The prospect of this neck-and-neck presidential election becoming a rerun of 2000's Bush v. Gore would be less worrisome if a federal agency created 10 years ago to help avoid that scenario weren't today what Roll Call deems “a shell of what Congress designed it to be.”

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission's four seats — two Democrat, two Republican, with vacancies having to be filled in tandem — are vacant due to congressional gridlock. Its executive director quit in 2011, its general counsel in May. It hasn't had a quorum of three commissioners to conduct business in nearly two years. And most of its $3 billion-plus in Help America Vote Act funding has been spent.

The original commissioners, Roll Call reports, took bipartisan consensus seriously. But after a Republican member left in February 2007, the commission became increasingly mired in partisan gamesmanship.

Fair, transparent elections, which should be everyone's goal, are more likely when the commission can carry out its educational mission — improving election administration, serving as a clearinghouse for voluntary voting-system guidelines and best practices, developing certification guidelines for testing voting machines and ensuring upgrades of states' voting technology.

Because public confidence in elections underpins public trust in government, restoring the Election Assistance Commission to what it should be — fully staffed and fully functional — must be a high priority for the next Congress.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. The Kane case: Charges upon charges
  2. Sunday pops
  3. The Box
  4. How to counter Putin in Syria
  5. The Oregon shooting: Tragic & appalling
  6. Saturday essay: Perpetual peppers
  7. Fire prevention: Service & honor
  8. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  9. UPMC’s mold
  10. The Pennsylvania budget: Wolf’s costly ploy