Greensburg Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012, 9:01 p.m.
Laurel: To sending a message. A record $15 million fine against a German manufacturer that helped LeNature's CEO pocket $118 million by inflating the cost of bottling equipment is a wake-up call: Whether out of ignorance or complicity, companies that get into these greedy get-rich schemes will take a hit, or worse, when these dealings inevitably explode. The one hatched by LeNature's Gregory Podlucky, serving a 20-year prison sentence, blew up and shut down his company. Along with Mr. Podlucky, his wife, son, brother and some of LeNature's executives also are serving time for their roles in what grew into a $861 million scheme.
Laurel: To Greensburg's commercial land value. The bids are in for a city-owned South Pennsylvania Avenue business property and they're encouraging. The five bids received by the city, which wants to get out of the landlord business, range from $475,000 (the city-set minimum) to $575,000 for a property appraised at $535,000. Despite a sluggish real-estate market, Greensburg still has investment value.
Lance: To a hit-and-run miscreant. Leaving the scene of an accident is bad enough. Driving into a wheelchair-bound man outside his Rostraver gun shop and fleeing the scene is despicable. Byron White, 74, owner of The Gun Rack, suffered a crushed pelvis and broken ribs. Police have a suspect. Some people deserve no license to drive — ever.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.