Energy independence: Don't blow it
The shale-fracking revolution has the United States on track to become the world's largest oil producer and on the verge of its longtime goal of energy independence — if the Obama administration will just stay out of the way.
A new International Energy Agency (IEA) report projects that America will supplant Saudi Arabia as No. 1 in oil production by about 2020, with North America as a whole becoming a net oil exporter as soon as 2030.
With America now importing about 45 percent of its oil and about 20 percent of its energy needs, the IEA says, that would be a “dramatic reversal of the trend seen in most energy-importing countries.” But that “dramatic reversal” won't happen if the Obama administration insists on pursuing policies that make domestic oil and gas extraction less profitable.
It must resist environmentalist supporters' calls for carbon taxes, cap-and-trade legislation, rules against drilling on public lands, anti-fracking laws and opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline. The Obama White House's love for winner-picking, taxpayer-funded “green” energy boondoggles doesn't help, either.
Proven, safe and economically sensible technologies for shale oil and gas extraction present an opportunity to strengthen America in a way unthinkable not long ago. If the Obama administration prevents U.S. energy independence, its policies will cost this nation dearly by weakening it immeasurably.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pipeline pap: The real agenda
- Saturday essay: Waltz of the robins
- Volunteers’ contributions: Growing flowers & more in Connellsville
- The ‘green’ ruse: Germany’s poor ‘model’
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- The Plum sex scandal: New, sad questions
- Baltimore burns: Destruction’s culture
- Saturday essay: Grandma Nick’s stormy forecast
- Assata’s deadly lesson
- Sunday pops