Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Nov. 26, 2012, 8:56 p.m.

School board's say: Despite arguments from parents and students against cutting the school day from eight periods to seven, the Franklin Regional School Board approved the proposal, allowing for “quality resource time” for students needing extra help. For student achievers who complain they're being shortchanged, the district will provide at least one honors foreign language class during that resource time. Still, many students who want to learn more will end up with less opportunity to do so.

Injustice answered: Some good ol'-fashioned police work led to the arrest of a Rostraver motorist who allegedly struck a wheelchair-bound gun shop owner, 74, and fled the scene. Turns out the suspect, Don Charles Eichler, 53, also failed to appear in court on a DUI arrest in March, according to a judge's bench warrant. Those who flee from their responsibility only compound the injury of their actions.

A rough road: Fayette municipal officials want their “fair share” of the county's projected $1.4 million from the state Marcellus Shale Act 13. Impact fees allocated to the county and municipalities fall short of what's needed to maintain roads used by drilling companies' heavy equipment, some officials say. But how much, in fairness, is “enough”? Yes, the drillers should fully cover road damages caused by their equipment. But this vague notion of “more, more, more!” ultimately could result in a lot less if fees drive drillers elsewhere.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.