Published: Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
Oliver Wyman, a business consulting firm, says ObamaCare's Health Insurance Tax — HIT for short — “will cause a significant and continuing rise in the cost of health insurance premiums.” And the hit will be hardest in neighboring West Virginia, where the average premium increase for small-business employees on a family plan will be as much as $9,000 in the first decade of implementation. At that rate, either no small businesses will be left in the Mountain State or none will be offering health coverage. Which is the ultimate goal of ObamaCare — nationalized health care. ... Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett says some state legislators refused to cooperate on some bills because, perhaps, he refused to sign budgets including those infamous WAMs — “walking around money” for pet projects. Mr. Corbett declined to name names. But those who decline to do their jobs because they couldn't get the chief executive to grease their dirty palms deserve to be exposed, then voted out of office. ... Speaking of Corbett, a few hours after visiting the Trib last Tuesday in Pittsburgh, he and first lady Susan Corbett lighted the Christmas tree on the front steps to the state Capitol in Harrisburg, resurrecting a tradition that was scrapped in the 1980s. It's nice to see. And do note, the tree is not called a “Holiday tree” or a “Unity tree” or a “Winter Solstice tree” or “Just a Tree So We Don't Offend Anyone.” It's called a “Christmas tree.” Hear! Hear!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- ‘China City’
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- Sunday pops
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- The Box
- The IRS scandal: FBI games