Connellsville's revitalization: The hotel question
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 7, 2012, 8:56 p.m.
As Connellsville continues its revitalization efforts, local officials have reviewed and continue to review various studies conducted over the years.
Studies have examined the proposed effects of the bike trail on Connellsville, downtown revitalization, historical aspects, environmental and recreational pluses — just to name a few.
Last week, PKF Consultants conducted a marketing study to see if a hotel would be supported in the city. The firm was hired by the Allegheny Trail Alliance.
Consultants talked to businesses and other officials in its fact-finding mission. Would a hotel be viable in Connellsville?
Previous studies have shown that those using the bike trail and those traveling through the city will spend more money here if they stay overnight. Several local business owners believe this. The city is home to several bed and breakfasts that opened in recent years.
We believe a hotel would be beneficial to the city's future and to its economy — provided it is a private enterprise without artificial (ie: taxpayer-funded) inducements.
The completion of the Great Allegheny Passage linking Pittsburgh to Washington, D.C., is expected to be completed next year. Anyone traveling the route could find Connellsville the perfect stop for an overnight stay.
The results of the study are expected to be released soon. Here's hoping this study generates the interest it deserves.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Malaysian jetliner probe: Passport insecurity
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats