ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Dec. 6, 2012, 8:59 p.m.

Lance: To the Freeport council and school board. The bodies will meet next week to discuss what to do with the junior high school and kindergarten properties when they close as part of the district's building and renovation program. But taxpayers aren't invited because, says borough treasurer Richard G. Hill Jr., “There will be plenty of time for public meetings.” What's wrong with now?

On the “Watch List”: UPMC. The tax-exempt status of the health care giant is under increasing scrutiny. Its untaxed holdings are vast. Compensation for executives is quite high. Its charitable care, while numerically high, is a small fraction of its income pie. Expect the matter to end up in court sooner rather than later.

Laurel: To setting an example. The wives of Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey organized a tribute this week to the heroes of Flight 93, hijacked by terrorists during 9/11, to raise money toward the Somerset County memorial. Here's a prime opportunity for members of Congress to open their wallets and support an important public endeavor.

The “Big” return: Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, out for a month with shoulder and rib injuries, is set to play on Sunday against the San Diego Chargers. Pittsburgh, 7-5, pretty much has a lock on a wild-card berth. The Steelers could — could — end the regular season with an 11-5 record, hitting their stride just as the playoffs open.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.