The Thursday wrap
The attorney for convicted serial child molester Jerry Sandusky says his client, subjected to greater security measures because of the high-profile nature of the Penn State case, “would like to be treated like every other convicted sex offender.” The attorney should be careful for what he wishes. ... Andrew Malcolm, writing in Investor's Business Daily, says the federal government has hired an average of 101 new employees every single day since Barack Obama took the oath of office. That's more than 143,000 new federal employees. And America's fiscal “problem” is that it doesn't tax “the rich” enough, is that it? ... General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt praised China on Tuesday: “The one thing that actually works, state-run communism ... .” Ah, so that's why he's such a big fan of crony capitalism masquerading as “national industrial policy.” Mr. Immelt, by the way, also is chairman of President Obama's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. All together now: “Good grief.” ... Said some liberal TV talking head the other day about negotiations to head off the approaching “fiscal cliff” — “Somebody's going to have to compromise here.” Silly us, but we thought “compromise” involved “somebodies,” not just one party. Liberals want Republican capitulation on tax hikes now and entitlement cuts later, nod-nod, wink-wink. Should the GOP capitulate, it will have written its own obituary.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.