... What about Pa.?
Published: Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012, 8:53 p.m.
So, as goes Michigan with right-to-work legislation, so goes Pennsylvania?
Ha! Don't count on it — not even with Republicans controlling the governor's mansion and the state Legislature.
Gov. Tom Corbett put it into perfect perspective for a Philadelphia radio station on Monday: “Until I see a strong will to get (right-to-work) legislation passed, we have a lot of other things that have to get passed.”
Mr. Corbett did not list right to work as a priority in a speech at The Pennsylvania Society in New York City last weekend. And it's had no legs in a Legislature that, on so many vital issues of the day, has no will and, thus, there's no way.
Or as Jake Haulk, president of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, puts it into blunt perspective:
“No liquor privatization. No teacher strike repeal. No fully funded school choice voucher program. No prevailing wage elimination. No reform of binding arbitration. No reform of the state's horrendously outdated property reassessment laws. No transit worker strike repeal. No pension reform worth calling reform.
“In short, if unions don't want it, it does not happen even with comfortable Republican majorities,” he says. “Although, to be sure, conservatives are not in a majority.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- More ObamaCare fallout: Medicare disadvantage
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- ‘Racism’? No
- The IRS scandal: FBI games
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- The Thursday wrap
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances