TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The 'Sandy Scam'

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012, 8:45 p.m.
 

What would a disaster-relief bill submitted just days before Christmas be without a good ol'-fashioned Washington tree trimming? Indeed, President Obama's $60.4 billion bauble-laden Tannenbaum for Hurricane Sandy relief truly decks taxpayers' halls.

Fiscal watchdogs are calling it “Sandy Scam” for valid reasons. Billions of dollars are slated for areas and special interests that have nothing to do with damages from Sandy, according to The New York Post and The Washington Times. Among the more audacious ornaments:

• $13 billion for “mitigation projects” to prepare for future storms.

• $150 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for fisheries in Alaska.

• $8 million to buy cars and equipment for the Justice and Homeland Security departments.

But these items should go through the regular appropriation process (such as it is) in Congress, right? Not if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., gets his way. He wants to speed the bill through. Never let a crisis go to waste, eh?

And it's not just Mr. Obama who's stringing tinsel. He sought $32 million to repair part of the Amtrak rail system; Senate elves pumped up that amount tenfold, according to The Times.

So while Congress and the president endeavor to fix the latest fix of their fiscal disregard — presumably without going over the so-called “cliff” — they're also decorating a disaster-relief “tree” that stands as a shining symbol of their hypocrisy.

 

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Christmas takes
  2. America the diminished: Cotton candy resolve
  3. Greensburg Christmas takes
  4. Alle-Kiski Christmas takes
  5. The revolving door: Washington’s ‘gift’
  6. U.N. Watch: Another jaded ‘inquiry’
  7. Expanding Medicaid: Gov.-elect Wolf embraces a false premise
  8. Pension reform should not be linked to a natural gas extraction tax
  9. The Kathleen Kane chronicles: New and serious questions are being raised about the Pa. attorney general