Tragedy's aftermath: Value of 'helpers'
“Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.”
— Luke 2:14
In the aftermath of the horrific massacre in Newtown, Conn., some remarked on the additional pain of it happening during Advent.
The celebration of Christmas on Tuesday might expand the awfulness for many touched by this terrible incident — as if anyone could be detached from it.
Yet the holiday may make poignant what is tragic.
The late Fred Rogers said: “When I was a boy and I would see scary things in the news, my mother would say to me, ‘Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping.'”
Let us make it part of our Christmas gift to one another to always be willing to be one of those helpers.
We have a tradition of being helpers. For instance, as the world was focused on the evolving news of the school shooting, local musicians were preparing for a benefit Christmas concert at Kittanning High School to aid a family with health problems. And consider the work of local civic and fraternal organizations, the marvelous Relay for Life organizations, the work of HAVIN, ARC Manor and professional educators and counselors who go beyond the call of duty.
We can be regular helpers in our families, our neighborhoods or our towns, bringing as many people into the circle of caring as possible — maybe even someone who might otherwise express anger in horrible ways. Helping can be heavy lifting, but made easier by loving hearts.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.