Welcome 2013: A resolution
Published: Friday, Dec. 28, 2012, 8:58 p.m.
Be it resolved," as government officials sometimes are wont to say, that in the new year of 2013, those very elected leaders in the Fay-West area will be more enterprising than they have been in recent years.
Part of that resolution will be the stipulation that if those leaders - in elected posts for boroughs, townships, county and school districts - do not show some initiative and true leadership qualities, the voters will turn them out of office. It is a municipal election year.
It is imperative that our local leaders have good communication skills, and that is more than a phrase to stick on the end of a resume.
Good leaders will manifest those skills in at least two ways:
They will promote cooperation on the panels on which they sit, working with even the most cantankerous of colleagues to advance the cause of taxpayers. They will also take the initiative to explain to the public - admittedly a less-than-enthusiastic group at times - what their government panels are doing to reduce costs and enhance services and to enlist their support.
Generally local leaders attend their regularly scheduled meetings and expect the majority of dialogue with citizens to happen there. We would urge them to call another forum at which real creative brainstorming can occur. Leaders who say that will never happen are not the kind that governing demands today. Oh, and calling a few press conferences wouldn't hurt either.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- The Box
- Sunday pops
- Corrections reinvention
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- ‘Merit selection’ for judges? No thank you
- Christmas in Connellsville: Catch the spirit
- ‘Racism’? No
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’