ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Dec. 27, 2012, 9:03 p.m.

Laurel: To Khalid Hussein. When a would-be robber tried to stick up the Allentown Dairy Mart on Christmas Eve, Mr. Hussein, the cashier on duty, nailed him with pepper spray. Police say the alleged thief, Mark Givner of New Kensington, debilitated by that spray, was easy to spot trying to shed his coat as he hobbled away. Here's to Hussein being the first and better shot.

Lance: To the Pittsburgh Steelers. Lots of highly paid “talent.” Lots of public support (from fanatics and taxpayers). And this is what we get — a badly broken team that's not playoff bound and one that needs a win Sunday against Cleveland just to have a .500 season. Here we go? There they went. Here's to lots of off-season retooling.

On the “Watch List”:

A convention center hotel. More than a few of Pittsburgh's “leaders” continue to push for a new (and publicly subsidized) hotel at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. It's supposedly “needed” to make the center “more attractive” for convention bookers. But all manner of hotel rooms are being added in Pittsburgh proper and, dare we say it, more and more are being privately financed. There's a market for new hotel rooms, all right — the kind only the free market should build and support.

• The I-576 extension. Pennsylvania Turnpike officials say that, beginning in 2014, they'll resume construction of the highway (better known as the Southern Beltway) from Route 22 in Washington County to the Washington-Allegheny county line at I-79. The price tag — now — is nearly $633 million. While the project might be worthy, the agency's financial position is not: It's nearly $8 billion in debt. Adding to that debt outweighs the project's benefits.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.