Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Dec. 27, 2012, 9:03 p.m.
Lance: To the Springdale Township commissioners. The commissioners must have been too busy with their Christmas shopping and merrymaking to see if the township's equipment was in proper working order before Wednesday's big snowstorm. They haven't replaced their lone roadworker/equipment maintenance person, then discovered their large dump truck — you know, the one used for plowing and salting — was out of order as the flakes were falling. No employees plus inoperable equipment equals failed management.
Laurel: To the Westmoreland County commissioners. The commissioners changed the county's fee structure for its Bureau of Weights and Measurements from a flat fee to one based on the number of devices inspectors actually check for accuracy. That was long overdue.
Lance: To the “new” Megan's Law. This law, placing greater requirements on the state police for the registration of sex offenders, is a fine example of a “feel good” statute. It sounds great, but in reality doesn't protect our children. It greatly increases the state's cost to oversee offenders. It passed for one reason: Legislators feared opposing it would open them to accusations they're pro-child molesters.
On the “Watch List”: The state Legislature. Companies that put large, heavy trucks on local roads have long been required to post bonds to pay for whatever damage their vehicles do. Unfortunately, the bond amount — $12,500 per mile — covers only about 10 percent of the cost of repaving. The Legislature last increased the amount in 1978 and has repeatedly declined to increase it over the years. It's way past time for the state to help local municipalities on this issue.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- The Nevada standoff
- All taken seriously
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics