Good riddance, Lisa Jackson
Published: Saturday, December 29, 2012, 8:04 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Lisa Jackson is an object lesson in the manifest dangers of Leviathanism.
Ms. Jackson, head of the Environmental Protection Agency, is resigning in the new year. She took the reputation of the long-thuggish EPA to new lows, foisting new, damaging and ideologically based regulations on the nation, often by dictatorial fiat, with little transparency (think of her secret email accounts) and with no basis in science.
Jackson's mission never was to protect or to better the environment but to use environmental regulations to reorder, if not browbeat, American society into the service of the state through the creation of a national industrial policy that, as history has repeatedly shown, implodes under its own hubris.
Think of Jackson's mission to destroy the coal industry and coal-fired electric utilities while rewarding bogus “green” energy. Think of new vehicle mileage standards designed to reward other government cronies.
And Jackson's “legacy” might be even worse if a still-to-come EPA study of fracking in oil and natural gas extraction proves to be the hatchet job many expect it to be.
The massive-cost-to-little-benefits mantra of Jackson's EPA played no small role in retarding economic activity and, with the cudgel of punitive actions held ever high, it injected the kind of perpetual uncertainty that sends a loud and clear message of “Why bother?” to investors and entrepreneurs.
Here's to never seeing the likes of a Lisa Jackson at the EPA again. Sadly, however, we know we will.
- The IRS & ObamaCare: Leviathan threatens
- The Thursday wrap
- Your government: More thuggery
- Oklahoma’s sorrow
- Primary 2013: Elect Sue Means
- An inconvenient truth: The CO2 scare
- The IRS hearing: And the nation gasped
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: Banana bike curls
- Sunday pops
- The Box
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Maybe you could explain for us the "history lesson" you have of the implosions in "national industry policy" that occurred since the last time someone reduced mercury and increased gas mileage. My guess is this rant of yours is because these regulations are unprecedented, so it's impossible to find any historical basis to compare, and therefore you just decide to spew out garbage instead. List Jacksons' mission certainly was to protect and better the environment. She succeeded with rules that enforce the first-ever national standards governing power plant emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants. Did you prefer the old "Bush way" of dumping mercury in our lakes and air? And the science and cost-benefits of car mileage increases are so good they were enthusiastically supported by the car companies. Maybe you could also report on the reduced federal deficit brought about by the reduced imports, or the healthier fish in the lakes there in rural redneck country.