Greensburg Tuesday takes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, 9:01 p.m.
One eyesore down?: Westmoreland County is moving ahead with legal proceedings to sell the decrepit Westmoreland Glass Co. factory site in Hempfield because of unpaid taxes. That should be the first step toward eliminating at least one eyesore from the county's landscape. Here's hoping that in the new year, the no-less-dilapidated Monsour Medical Center and Jeannette Glass plant will be relegated to rubble — and on their respective owners' dime.
Cost of justice: The legal/incarceration bill for six defendants charged in the torture/murder of Jennifer Daugherty in Greensburg has reached $650,000 and is expected to increase as two of the accused, Ricky Smyrnes and Amber Meidinger, go on trial this year; both face the death penalty. One can take issue with the excessive cost of certain things, such as so-called “expert witnesses.” What no one can put a price on, and that which is still owed, is full justice for Ms. Daugherty.
First snow: The first significant snowfall, whether it's measured in inches or feet, tends to be especially challenging both for local road departments and motorists, and last week's storm was no exception in Westmoreland County. Lots of accidents, lots of complaints about snow removal and lots of sidewalks that weren't adequately cleared. The season's just getting started. Let's make it bearable for each other with more patience on the roads and better dedicated snow-removal efforts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- The Adegbile nomination: Rejecting race-baiting
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out
- The Thursday wrap
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- Corbett’s fortunes: Troubling truths
- The Russian invasion: Sanctions, now
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness
- Saturday essay: Coyote showdown?