Share This Page

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

An observation: The Steelers never made the NFL playoffs this season. The Penguins and the NHL continue their player lockout. The Pirates are busy preparing for a 21st straight season of Major Losing Baseball. Heck, isn't it about time for some Pittsburgh “leader,” egged on by some investor looking to slough off his capital costs onto others, to propose building a taxpayer-financed arena to lure an NBA franchise to give us an “insurance policy” against such sporting failures? Ahem.

Another observation: Officials in Aspinwall have begun enforcing an ordinance requiring sidewalk snow removal within 12 hours of the snowfall. Other communities have similar rules with varying grace periods. And it's a safety no-brainer — everybody from kids walking to school to letter carriers bringing the mail often find the walking tough going. But there are those, either because of age or illness, who cannot comply. Here's to good neighbors lending a helping shovel and a smattering of snow and ice melt.

A third observation: For some inexplicable reason, more than a few homeowners in more than a few communities think it perfectly acceptable to shovel their driveway and sidewalk snow into the street. It's not. And it's not simply ignorance but dangerous stupidity. For if the hazard they create causes an accident, well, they can and should be held liable. (As should local municipalities that, in the fall, mandate that leaves be gathered on the street at curbside for pickup. That's a hazard, too.)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.