By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013, 8:43 p.m.
The Corbett administration has become quite sensitive to criticism that the Republican governor's record has been “lackluster” as he reaches the midway point of his four-year term. Tom Corbett's many achievements have been overlooked, some have argued.
Indeed, there have been notable achievements. Some tax and tort reforms come to mind. So, too, does his fealty to on-time and more frugal budgets and more government transparency. All that stipulated, Gov. Corbett has some heavy lifting to do over the next two years.
While we're pleased to see his administration ready to tackle long overdue pension reforms, the governor would serve all Pennsylvanians better by taking to the bully pulpit on the issue. And while he says he's committed to solving the commonwealth's public transportation funding dilemma, those words will be seen as ineffectual if his proposal doesn't include removing the strike cudgel of public transit unions, which has led to unsustainable contracts.
Much has been made of the fact that Republicans not only control both houses of the General Assembly but by the largest majorities in half a century and that some major reforms have languished. And while we appreciate the governor's standard modi operandi of promoting his agenda in a civil manner, we would remind him that keeping a big stick under the bully pulpit is not only appropriate but sometimes necessary.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The big sting: To what end?
- Sunday pops
- Saturday essay: Resurrection
- THE BOX
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- Easter 2014: Churches’ vital role
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time