Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Hockey returns: The National Hockey League lost nearly four months of its season to a lockout. Millions of dollars in ancillary economic activity was lost in Pittsburgh and elsewhere. And surely some fans will continue to hold the NHL a grudge. But a new contract is expected to be ratified by players on Wednesday, a truncated season will bow, the Zambonis will be running again and all will be right with the world.
Hockey's failure: The supposed “major victory” for NHL players in the new contract is a wildly generous defined-benefits pension plan that will pay vested players, beginning at age 55, up to $250,000 annually. But that kind of liability might prove to be an albatross around the owners' necks. And players might find themselves to be too clever by half, considering a defined-contribution plan most assuredly would offer an even more generous retirement income.
Hockey's challenge: The lockout-shortened NHL season will turn a marathon into a sprint. “Fresh legs” should make for plenty of exciting play and some interesting coaching strategies. But the sprint could lead to more injuries (especially for those who might have slacked on their conditioning) and novel game management that, should it fail for even one game series, could leave precious time to recover. But surely the gods of hockey will prevail, right? And, oh, before we forget, “Hey!”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.