Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, January 10, 2013, 8:58 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
On the “Watch List”: The LTV redevelopment. A tax-increment-financing package of up to $90 million is being proposed to facilitate the nearly $1 billion redevelopment of the old LTV coke works in Hazelwood. In a twist that appears to protect taxpayers, the TIF would use a portion of the increased taxes the project is expected to create to underwrite not bonds but a loan from several foundations to pay for public infrastructure for which the development would create a demand at the blighted 178-acre site. If the project doesn't produce the required revenue or fails, the foundations would be on the hook. If that's the case, this TIF is worth careful study.
Laurel: To the Buncher Co. It initially sought a $50 million TIF package to redevelop 63 acres along the Allegheny River in the Strip District. Pittsburgh City Council balked. Not only was it a questionable use of tax-increment financing — the site is hardly “blighted” — the council was using approval of the TIF as a cudgel to get its own way. That Buncher now appears to believe it can fully assume the risk and make a handsome profit is encouraging and should be an object lesson for other developers.
Lance: To Pittsburgh Public Schools. Even in the face of a critical state audit, the district continues to invoke “personnel issues” to hide from public scrutiny why it paid former deputy superintendent Lynn Spampinato nearly a quarter of a million dollars to go bye-bye a few years back. Public schools. A public position. The public's money. And the public has no right to know? What arrogance.
Most Popular Editorials
- An inconvenient truth: The CO2 scare
- The IRS hearing: And the nation gasped
- Primary 2013: Elect Sue Means
- Go with the flow
- The primary: Time for some pruning
- The Box
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: Banana bike curls
- The Benghazi scandal: Obama’s buck
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Another cyber ‘intrusion’: Is an attack next?
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.





