Hagel for Defense?: Bruises ahead
Published: Monday, January 7, 2013, 11:52 a.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Chuck Hagel needn't worry about whether Republicans support their fellow former GOP senator for secretary of Defense. It's pretty clear that his former colleagues think so little of him that he'll likely have difficulty gaining even one Republican vote.
What Mr. Hagel has to worry about is whether he can gain sufficient Democrat support. And that appears to be a most-iffy proposition.
Hagel morphed into a liberal Republican who represented Nebraska in the U.S. Senate for two terms ending in 2009. At least on the surface, he appears to be the perfect choice to succeed Leon Panetta. Hagel's not only a decorated Vietnam veteran, supposedly attuned well to the needs of the military and how to balance them with today's fiscal realities, but he spent time on the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence committees.
But his record remains quite problematic. Think of his belittling of the U.S.-Israel alliance and his push to have Israel negotiate with terrorists. Think of his past intemperate remarks about gays, for which he only recently apologized, and that only when his name was floated for the Defense job. And think of what many perceive to be his coddling of Iran's mullahs.
But Hagel also spread so much ill will among his onetime Senate colleagues with his hardly amicable style that there's no “natural base” of support left among Republicans or Democrats, reports Politico.
The nation has more pressing needs than a bruising confirmation battle. The nation can do better than Chuck Hagel.
- Your government: More thuggery
- ObamaCare lies: Shocking truths
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Benghazi scandal: Obama’s buck
- An inconvenient truth: The CO2 scare
- Primary 2013: We recommend ...
- Primary 2013: Elect Sue Means
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- Shooting blanks
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
It appears that the editorial board belongs to the Neocon chapter of publishing that believes there is no such thing as a bad war. You care more about Israel than sending young men and women of this country into the arena to be maimed and killed in your selective wars that you lack the guts to fight. You as your favorite SECDEF, Cheney have more important things to do than serve in the armed forces. As far as gays, why did you endorse Mitt Romney? Mitt thinks “it’s not right” for gays to have kids.