TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


The great guns debate: Grabbers rise anew

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | RSS | Mobile


By Tribune-Review

Published: Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 8:56 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Post-Sandy Hook, the great debate over guns has sunken to new levels of deceit and misrepresentation, all in the name of unconstitutional gun-grabbing. Consider legislation being proposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

The California Democrat seeks to dishonestly redefine “assault weapons” — heretofore machine-gun-type weaponry banned nearly 30 years ago — to be just about any weapon that liberals think looks especially menacing or they simply don't like. She proposes measures clearly in violation of the Second Amendment.

Under Ms. Feinstein's nomenclature, millions of quite common and quite popular semiautomatic handguns, shotguns and rifles (the latter two simply because they have a pistol-like grip) would be banned. Outlawed, too, generally, would be magazines, fixed or detachable, capable of holding 10 or more rounds. (As if a six-round magazine makes a difference, given the mere seconds it takes to change one.)

According to one analysis, not one handgun could survive the legislation.

And adding a new level of tyranny to this Bill of Rights nose-thumbing, the Feinstein measure additionally would go after existing owners of these newly offending weapons. Their guns would have to be registered with the government (including telling the feds where they're stored). The guns could not be transferred. Should the owner die, the government would seize and destroy them.

What's the real threat here — guns or the government? Consider it a rhetorical question.

Most Popular Editorials

  1. An inconvenient truth: The CO2 scare
  2. The IRS hearing: And the nation gasped
  3. Primary 2013: Elect Sue Means
  4. Go with the flow
  5. The primary: Time for some pruning
  6. The Box
  7. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  8. Saturday essay: Banana bike curls
  9. The Benghazi scandal: Obama’s buck
  10. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  11. Another cyber ‘intrusion’: Is an attack next?
You must be signed in to add comments

To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.