Monsour's legacy: An inhospitable tale
It's said the deeds of men live on long after they're gone. Sadly, many of Dr. William Monsour's deeds are embodied in a decaying monstrosity that bears the family name in plain view along a busy Route 30 corridor in Westmoreland County.
Dr. Monsour, 84, one of four founding (and often infighting) brothers of the scandal-plagued Monsour Medical Center, died Monday at his Jeannette home. The irascible one-time hospital CEO lived to see the family dream of a functioning hospital become a dysfunctional public nightmare. It was a textbook tutorial in how not to run a hospital.
Mired in financial problems, the Monsour Medical Center closed in 2006 after flunking various state inspections. And when its board and last CEO, Michael Monsour, finally turned off the lights, the family walked away from a towering dump of hazardous medical waste and scattered patient files which, by law, should have been secured.
The hospital fiasco is one chapter in “Dr. Bill's” medical career, which includes an indictment for Medicare fraud and a lawsuit over money allegedly diverted from a health insurance company he founded.
And still unresolved is the disposition of the decaying medical center, at a demolition cost of up to $2 million. If the Monsour family wants to do something positive in William Monsour's memory, it would raze the crumbling edifice that's become synonymous with him and the legacy he left behind.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama’s amnesty: Abuse of power
- Ford City’s police: A taxing question
- Thanksgiving 2014: A season for giving
- Saturday essay: Prelude to thanks
- The Kathleen Kane chronicles: The Pa. attorney general’s credibility is gone
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: Fallen leaves
- Taxing policies
- Let there be lights: Bless nonprofit, everyone
- Connellsville roundtable: A good first step
- The Mitch Rubin sentence: Another wet noodle