The Hilda Solis legacy: Big Labor's propagandist departs
Hilda Solis is a metaphor for the malady known as “progressivism” — an affliction so debilitating that its devotees are blinded by their government-knows-best paternalism and whose hubris is exceeded only by their ignorance.
And we're being charitable.
Ms. Solis is the nation's departing secretary of Labor. Make that the departing secretary of Organized Labor. For she carried more water for the cartels of coercion and workplace perversion than any Labor secretary in history. (And that would include Frances Perkins, the first government Labor boss beginning in 1933 whose brain warps included such unsustainable disasters as Social Security and federal minimum wage floors.)
Ms. Solis' job was “to foster, promote and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers and the retirees of the United States.” All of them, we would remind, not just u nionized ones.
Think of Solis' shameful opposition to right-to-work laws, her equally shameful support for “card check” and support for insane regulations that would have made it illegal for farm family kids to perform the usual chores of farm family kids. And under her watch, the Labor Department went to extraordinary lengths to hide union corruption.
Don't expect any successor, in this administration, to be any better than this departing propagandist.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.