Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To the Armstrong School Board. The board stood up to labor-union pressure and opened its $55 million junior-senior high school project for bidding without a project labor agreement. A PLA would've guaranteed the project would go to a union contractor. This decision allows all contractors — union and non-union, to compete for the bid. This should allow the project to be completed on time and within budget.
On the “Watch List”: The North Apollo VFD. The department apparently can't raise enough money to survive and firefighters want the borough Council to impose an $80 annual fee on every household to help. Not long ago, we heard how the VFDs in Apollo were having financial problems. How about these departments work together to find cost savings before sticking their hands in the taxpayers' pockets.
An observation: Can it get any worse for Steeler fans — Baltimore and New England playing for the AFC Championship? A Ravens win means an arch-nemesis gets a trip to the Super Bowl and we'll have to listen to two weeks of Ray Lewis hype. We're gagging already. A Patriots win means Tom Brady and Bill Belichick get a chance to tie Terry Bradshaw's and Chuck Noll's record for Super Bowl wins.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Recasting the EPA: Devolving power to the states
- Another carbon credit scheme
- School funding canard: Money isn’t the answer