A new Dem assault: Will the GOP repel it?
Published: Monday, Jan. 21, 2013, 8:53 p.m.
The Republicans' capitulation in last year's “fiscal cliff” negotiations has come back to bite them and quickly. How they react next could well determine the fate of the party.
The Democrat-controlled Senate plans to draft a budget (imagine that!) calling for significantly higher taxes on the wealthy and oil and gas companies, among others. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., one of the upper chamber's leading vagrants of vicissitudes, confirmed the new, longer and more splintery shaft on NBC's “Meet the Press” on Sunday.
Democrats will tie any spending cuts to higher taxes, he says.
See what happens when venomous snakes are allowed to slither away and bite for another day?
You'll recall that “fiscally responsible Democrats” — an oxymoron, we know, but we use the phrase for the Guffaw Effect — haven't passed a budget in four years. Now, smelling elephant blood in the water and ready to enact their next step in hoping to further divide, conquer and eventually eliminate the Republican Party, they'll do the magnanimous thing and pass a budget — but only with even more and even higher taxes (on top of the fiscal cliff deal's even more and even higher taxes and the GOP capitulation on the debt ceiling).
Reminded Niccolo Machiavelli: “Men are so simple and yield so quickly to the wants of the moment that he who will trick will always find another who will suffer himself to be tricked.”
Clearly, Democrats have the Republicans' number. What a sad moment for republican governance.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Monsour monstrosity
- ObamaCare & minimum wages: A double whammy
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- The Thursday wrap
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- Christmas in Connellsville: Catch the spirit
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances